GRAND
COUNTY TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
RFP
QUERIES / RFP Addendum No.
1
TO:
ALL Request For Proposal Recipients [1]
FROM:
Sue Ann Fitch, Chair
Grand
County Transit Advisory Committee
P. O. Box 1808
Grand Lake, CO
80447
DATE:
November
8, 1999
______________________________________________________________________________
Attached please find the
Grand County Transit Advisory Committee's responses to all inquiries
received by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 3, 1999.
Again, if you would like me to e-mail the original RFP
to you for your use in developing your bid/proposal, please let
me know at esmerelda1@hotmail.com
.
Please
note that we have EXTENDED the deadline by which RFP bids/proposals
must be received in Hot Sulphur Springs, Colorado to
4:00
p.m. on FRIDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1999.
This
addendum to the RFP has been e-mailed to those prospective consultants
for which I have an e-mail address and mailed by U.S. Mail to
all others. In order
for your bid/proposal to be considered, you must include with
your bid/proposal a fully executed copy of the second page of
this memorandum indicating your receipt of this Addendum No. 1.
This
addendum is issued pursuant to Section II. B. 4 of the RFP.
Further, Section II.B. 3 is amended to read:
3.
Incorporation of RFP, addenda and response in
contract. This RFP, all addenda and the submitted
bid/proposal will become a part of any contract or Purchase Order
issued for this project.
Any additional changes shall be mutually agreed
upon and incorporated in writing into the final executed contract
document.
In addition, each reference in the RFP to
ìGrand Countyî (but not to ìthe
Grand County Advisory Committeeî) is amended to read ìGrand
and Jackson Counties,î and each reference to ìthe
Transit Advisory Committeeî is amended to read ìthe
Grand County Transit Advisory Committee.î
Grand
County, Jackson County and the Grand County Transit Advisory Committee
look forward to receiving your bid/proposal.
GRAND
COUNTY TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The
following form must be completed and included with any bid/proposal
submitted in response to that Request for Proposals dated October
15, 1999 issued by the Grand County Transit Advisory Committee
seeking to hire a professional consultant to prepare a Transportation
Development Program. No
bid/proposal will be considered that is not accompanied by a fully
executed copy of this receipt.
The undersigned
acknowledges receipt of the following addenda to the RFP:
Addendum No.
1, Dated November 8, 1999.
Offeror/bidder:
_________________________________________________
Name
_________________________________________________
Signature of Authorized
Signer
_________________________________________________
Title
___________________________________________________________
Address
___________________________________________________________
City,
State, Zip
___________________________________________________________
Phone, fax & e-mail
___________________________________________________________
Date
1.
The deadlines of the RFP have been changed to:
|
December
10, 1999 |
Proposals
due from Potential Consultants |
|
January
10, 2000 |
Short List Potential Consultants Notified
of Request to Augment RFP response and/or interviews/negotiations
begin |
|
January
20, 2000 |
Short
list proposal augmentations due and/or interviews/negotiations
continue |
|
February
15, 2000 |
Consultant
contract awarded |
|
February
29, 2000 |
Contract
execution deadline |
|
July
1, 2000 |
Draft
TDP due from Consultant to TAC and others (no change) |
|
July
1-31, 2000 |
Review
of Draft by TAC and others (no change) |
|
Aug.
1-October 1, 2000 |
Public
Comment and Revision Period (no change) |
|
November
1, 2000 |
Final
TDP due (no change) |
2.
Jackson County will join in the preparation of this
TDP.
Jackson County is adjacent to Grand County to the north.
Situated in North Park, Jackson County is mainly a ranching
and timbering community with some strip coal mining, and oil and
gas leasing. Jackson
County's total population is approximately 1800 persons, or 620
families spread over 1,613 square miles for a population density
of .5 persons/square mile.
There is one population center in or near which approximately
the county population resides, the town of Walden, and two scheduled
existing transit providers, the Council on Aging and the North
Park School District. Annual per capita income as of 1990 was $10,858
and median annual family income as of 1990 was $23,239.
Additional demographic information is available from the
1990 U.S. Census of Population and Housing and the Northwest Council
of Governments website nwc.cog.co.us.
Within Jackson County are found numerous Colorado State
Recreation, Wildlife and/or Wilderness areas, as well as both
Colorado State and National forests.
Transportation destinations to/from Walden include:
Laramie, Wyoming (65 miles north); Fort Collins, Colorado
(100 miles east); Steamboat
Springs, Colorado (60 miles west) and Granby, Colorado (55 miles
south in Grand County).
Tourism and recreational visitors are growing contributors
to the economy of Jackson County but have a substantially smaller
impact than in Grand County.
A.
Each of the identified tasks in the RFP will be completed
for Jackson County, however each is much simpler due to the lower
population, single population center and very limited number of
existing transit providers.
B.
Jackson County has no prior TDP.
However, demographic and other information is readily available
and extensively computerized.
C.
The contact persons in Jackson County will be the County
Administrator (Kent Crowder), P. O. Box 1019, Walden, CO
80480, (970) 723-4660 (phone), (970) 723-4706 (fax)
and the Board of County Commissioners (particularly Commissioner
Dennis Brinker), 2135 County Road 26A, Coalmont, CO
80430 (970) 723-4483 (phone), (970) 723-3246 (fax).
D.
The consultant will be expected to conduct two additional
public meetings; one during the information gathering stage, one
during the information distributing (draft TDP) stage, both in
Walden, Colorado.
E.
The consultant will be expected to prepare for distribution
at least an additional 10 copies of the draft TDP
and an additional 15 copies of the final TDP, both for
distribution within Jackson County.
3.
Budget.
The proposed budget for the combined Grand/Jackson County
TDP is $35,000-$40,000.
4.
Key issues. Please refer to the RFP.
5.
Administrative Support.
The Grand County Transit Advisory Committee meets in Granby
for work sessions at least monthly (first Thursday, 6-8:30p),
as will the Existing Transit Provider Subcommittee. Each existing transit provider in both counties
has been or will be asked to participate in these work sessions. The TAC consists of more than 35 members providing
wide representation from various economic, governmental and regional
facets of Grand County & approximately 25 members attend these
work sessions regularly.
Jackson County representatives will join in those meetings.
All members of the Grand County TAC and the Jackson County representatives
will be readily available to assist the consultant in gathering
data and, as appropriate, analyzing data, to facilitate RFP task
completion and the TDP.
Both Grand and Jackson Counties have conducted surveys
(Grand more recently than Jackson), from which local Master Plans
were developed and approved. Respective Councils on Aging recently conducted
surveys in both counties.
Both counties have digital data readily available, including
GIS support which can be provided on disk.
Because this administrative support will be provided as
needed, it is not possible to quantify the time which will be
committed.
6.
Surveys.
In addition to the extensive information already available
about both counties (see No. 5 above and Section IV.A. Summary
of the RFP), it is expected that Winter Park and Silver Creek/Berthoud
Ski areas will conduct ridership surveys during the upcoming ski
season, at their own cost and with the assistance of the TAC and
the chosen consultant. The
TAC will rely upon the expertise of the consultant to determine
if those combined sources of information are adequate to prepare
the TDP requested; if
not, additional survey(s)
focused on the issue of transit/transportation may be required.
7.
Retention of Reports.
To the extent that the reports identified in Section IV.A.
Summary (pages 6-7) of the RFP are public information,
copies may be made and retained by the consultant. Whether or not additional reports and/or information
may be retained by the selected Consultant will be determined
on a case-by-case basis;
retention would, in some cases, require licensing and payment
of a fee. Certain
other materials may only be used by the consultant
and may not be retained or copied, except as included in the draft
and/or final TDP, e.g. digital data.
8.
Meetings with TAC, its chair, and/or Grand/Jackson County
representatives.
Again, once the contract is awarded the Consultant selected
will be afforded liberal opportunity to meet with any member of
the TAC and/or other representatives of Grand and/or Jackson town
and county government(s). If interviews are conducted,
consultants chosen for interviews will meet with a representative
group from the TAC/Grand/Jackson County.
There will be no other opportunity prior
to the contract being awarded for potential consultants to meet
with representatives of the TAC/Grand/Jackson County. The Chair of the Grand County TAC will be the
initial and primary contact with the chosen consultant during
the preparation of the TDP.
9.
Listing of all RFP Recipients.
Attached.
10.
Relationship between RFP/TDP and informal TAC effort
to obtain expert implementation advice on possible ways/means
of coordinating existing transit services/providers.
The TAC Chair has been exploring the idea of a l/2 day
presentation to the existing transit providers on ways/means of
coordinating service irrespective of whether or not a formal TDP
can be successfully implemented.
This idea has not been presented to the full Existing Transit
Provider subcommittee yet because it has not yet formally met. The existing transit providers are trying
to get together starting now (this month, hopefully), to start
discussing the issues. Then
once a consultant is hired, they will plan to work closely with
him/her/it on those TDP tasks related to ideas such as
inventorying and coordination of existing service.
A l/2 day seminar, IF the existing providers subcommittee
is interested, would be an adjunct to the task facing the existing
providers - an idea to get them discussing the issues they need
to discuss regardless of who might eventually be selected as consultant.
Neither this task nor any associated costs are included
in the RFP.
11.
Number of Queries Received
.
The TAC chair received RFP queries from five proposed consultants
& several of the questions were duplicates. Two RFP mailings
were returned ëundeliverable.' One RFP recipient has dropped
out of consideration, citing lack of upcoming time to devote to
the project.
12.
RFP, Section II.A.7. Reminder. Responses to all timely written communications
are being made available to each known prospective Consultant. Oral explanations or instructions given before
the award of any Contract are not binding.
Oral or written explanations or instructions received other
than from the TAC by this process are not binding.
Mr.
David Krutsinger BRW
Group 1225
17th St., Suite 200 Denver,
CO 80202 |
Mr.
David E. Hattan Centennial
Engineering P.
O. Drawer 1307 Arvada,
CO 80001 |
Mr.
Steve Holt Felsburg,
Holt & Ullevig 7951
E. Maplewood Ave,#200 Englewood,
CO 80111-4725 |
|
|
Mr.
David Leahy TDA
Colorado, Inc. 1675
Larimer St., #600 Denver,
CO 80202 |
Ms.
Suzanne O'Neill TransitPlus P.
O. Box 637 Elizabeth,
CO 80107 |
|
Mr.
Robert E. Leigh Leigh,
Scott & Cleary, Inc. 1889
York Street Denver,
CO 80206 |
|
Mr.
David Sharfarz Transportation
& Logistics 1817
Eldorado Superior,
CO 80027 |
|
Mr.
Alan Canter Canter
& Associates 2353
S. Olive Street Denver,
CO 80224 |
Ms.
Nancy Brumley Transportation
Solutions 3653
S. King St., #2 Denver,
CO 80250 |
Woodward-Clyde
Consultants 4582
S. Ulster St. Pkwy., #606 Denver,
CO 80237 |
|
Leigh,
Scott & Cleary, Inc. 101
N. Tejon, #200 Colorado
Springs, CO 80903 |
Ms.
Sara Jane MacLennan Kimerly-Horn
& Associates 1515
Arapaho St.,Tower 1, #500 Denver,
CO 80202 |
Ms.
Linda Diebert Connections
Consulting Service 1005
Waite Drive Boulder,
CO 80308 |
|
Mr.
Bob Sakagachi Carter
& Burgess, Inc. 216
16th Street Mall, #1700 Denver,
C O 80202 |
|
Mr.
David Lilly P.
O. Box 770122 Steamboat
Springs, CO 80477 |
|
Mr.
David Holtis DeLeuw
Cather & Co. 1700
Broadway, #1016 Denver,
CO 80290 |
Mr.
Carlos Hernandez Charlier
Associates 1877
Broadway, #705 Boulder,
CO 80302 |
Mr.
Ray Moe Balloffet
& Associates, Inc. 1444
Wazee St., #225 Denver,
CO 80202 |
|
Ms.
Amy Ostrander Transit
Consultant P.
O. Box 2386 Frisco,
CO 80443 |
Mr.
Randy Harrison Daniel,Mann,Johnson
& Mendenhall 410
17th St, Suite 300 Denver,
CO 80202 |
Mr.
Dick A. Moore Parsons
Brinkerhoff 1660
Lincoln Denver,
CO |
|
Mr.
William Stringfellow TranSystems 7800
E. Union, #500 Denver,
CO 80237 |
Ms.
Joanne Higgins TransPlan 1375
Walnut St., #211 Boulder,
CO 80302 |
Ms.
Margi Ness Margaret
Ness Associates 2030
Floral Drive Boulder,
CO 80304 |
|
Mr.
J. William Rodman MultiSystems 10
Fawcett Street Cambridge,
MA 02138-1110 |
Ms.
Cyndi Kirby HNTB
Corporation 1600
Broadway, Suite 1300 Denver,
CO 80202 |
Ms.
Holly Miller TDA
Colorado, Inc. 1675
Larimer Street, Suite 600 Denver,
CO 80202 |
|
Ms. Jennifer
Reid/Mr. Ray Moe Balloffet
and Associates, Inc. 345 E. Mountain
Avenue Fort Collins,
CO 80524 |
Mr. Brian
Kennedy Community
Matters, Inc. 4505 Ottawa
Place Boulder,
CO 80303
|
Community
Matters, Inc. 5601
S. Nevada Littleton,
CO 80120 |
|
Lonco Engineers 1380 Lawrence
Street Denver, CO
80204 |
|
|